W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > March 2010

[Bug 9187] Need transparency in issue and bug status in databases & document.

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2010 13:11:01 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1NozDB-0001Xs-9B@wiggum.w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9187





--- Comment #5 from Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>  2010-03-09 13:11:00 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Hi Laura,
> 
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > Could the chairs please confirm:
> > 
> > * If a change proposal is not completed by its deadline, the issue will be
> > closed without prejudice and DEFERRED to the NEXT VERSION of HTML.
> > 
> > * An issue that is closed without prejudice in this way can only be e-raised
> > with approval of the HTML Chairs. It is an ENDPOINT for the escalation process.
> > 
> > Are these correct?
> 
> I believe those statements are nearly direct quotes from the decision policy,
> and have already been confirmed by the chairs via email. Are you looking for
> some further clarification in the policy itself?

That would be very helpful. Some do not yet understand the repercussions of
missing deadlines and the finality of closing an issue. 

The chairs have been generous in repeatedly extending deadlines to the point
were deadlines may not be taken seriously by some.

Realistic and reasonable deadlines should be mutually agreed upon, set, and
then actually met not only by individual working group members but by task
force groups as well. 


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 9 March 2010 13:11:02 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 9 March 2010 13:11:03 GMT