W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > March 2010

[Bug 9187] Need transparency in issue and bug status in databases & document.

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2010 19:18:41 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1Nnd2n-0007P9-K1@wiggum.w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9187


Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com




--- Comment #1 from Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>  2010-03-05 19:18:41 ---
Could the chairs please confirm:

* If a change proposal is not completed by its deadline, the issue will be
closed without prejudice and DEFERRED to the NEXT VERSION of HTML.

* An issue that is closed without prejudice in this way can only be e-raised
with approval of the HTML Chairs. It is an ENDPOINT for the escalation process.

Are these correct?

Thanks.

Also it isn't clear from the process document if there is a differences between
 CLOSED and "TIMED OUT". 


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 5 March 2010 19:18:42 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 5 March 2010 19:18:43 GMT