- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 09:28:56 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10041 Summary: Document lacks discussion about ratinale for section element Product: HTML WG Version: unspecified Platform: PC OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: HTML5 differences from HTML4 (editor: Anne van Kesteren) AssignedTo: annevk@opera.com ReportedBy: marcosc@opera.com QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org CC: mike@w3.org, public-html@w3.org, annevk@opera.com >>>> On what grounds was the addition of the section element made? what was >>>> lacking in HTML4? >>> >>> That seems like something for this document: >>> >>> http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/Rationale >> >> To me, it seems like something that should be in this document. Also, >> I'm not interested in the WHATWG HTML spec, I am interested in the W3C >> HTML spec. It's already terribly confusing that there are two >> versions, and the fact that the WHATWG version keeps growing outside >> the scope of the W3C version might make the scope of the WHATWG >> rationale larger than W3C HTML5. > > Lets cross that bridge when it becomes an actual problem. It's a problem. I would like a working group decision then on this matter and/or a formal response from the WG chair. >>> Since you are asking the same question for all new elements I have >>> omitted those questions from my reply. >> >> For each, the questions still apply. > Again, I would like a working group decision on this matter and/or a formal response from the WG chair. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 29 June 2010 09:28:57 UTC