- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 16:17:14 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9872 --- Comment #2 from Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au> 2010-06-17 16:17:13 --- Javascript URIs have real use cases. Without being able to include them in links, distributing bookmarklets to users would not be possible. This is also not an accessibility issue either, but rather a universality issue. Browsers utilising assistive technology can still activate and execute links with javacript: URIs without any problems. The only browsers that are inherently affected are those without javascript supported, but that is not an accessibility specific issue. There is also no inherent problem with the use of javascript URIs. But rather a problem with the way in which they are commonly used in ways that are more appropriately handled with regular http links and event handlers or the target attribute. Making all javascript URIs a conformance error because of these less than ideal uses is not the right approach to address the real problem, which is with regards to their misuse, rather than any use at all. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 17 June 2010 16:17:16 UTC