W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > June 2010

[Bug 9926] New: when lots of keywords (tags) you waste lots of bandwidth in html. A meterGROUP looks more usefull where max is the total amount of tags, min is 0 and value is the current instances of the tag. example: <metergroup max="100" min="0" high="60" optimal="80"

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 21:46:02 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-ID: <bug-9926-2486@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9926

           Summary: when lots of keywords (tags) you waste lots of
                    bandwidth in html. A meterGROUP looks more usefull
                    where max is the total amount of tags, min is 0 and
                    value is the current instances of the tag. example:
                    <metergroup max="100" min="0" high="60" optimal="80"
           Product: HTML WG
           Version: unspecified
          Platform: Other
               URL: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#tag
                    -cloud
        OS/Version: other
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: HTML5 spec (editor: Ian Hickson)
        AssignedTo: ian@hixie.ch
        ReportedBy: contributor@whatwg.org
         QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
                CC: mike@w3.org, public-html@w3.org


Section: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#tag-cloud

Comment:
when lots of keywords (tags) you waste lots of bandwidth in html. A meterGROUP
looks more usefull where max is the total amount of tags, min is 0 and value
is the current instances of the tag. example:  <metergroup max="100" min="0"
high="60" optimal="80"><meter value="10">Apple</meter><meter
value="15">kiwi</meter></metergroup>

Posted from: 200.40.88.18

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 14 June 2010 21:46:04 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 14 June 2010 21:46:10 GMT