- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2010 20:36:12 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9894 Summary: The chairs should be required to ensure that decisions result in consistent specifications Product: HTML WG Version: unspecified Platform: PC OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: working group Decision Policy AssignedTo: dave.null@w3.org ReportedBy: ian@hixie.ch QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org CC: mjs@apple.com, Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com, rubys@intertwingly.net, mike@w3.org The decision process currently leads to decisions that make the spec inconsistent. For example, the recent decision to remove a paragraph of implementation advice in one section left another paragraph with essentially the same advice untouched, and left dozens of other paragraphs with similar advice alone. The process should be changed to require that the chairs ensure that working group decisions are based on general guidelines that can be consistently applied to the whole specification (or group of specifications, where appropriate). For example, in the case above, the working group decision could have been "the html specification should not include optional implementation advice", or "the html specification should not attempt to improve accessibility" or "the html specification should not acknowledge the possibility of authors making authoring mistakes", each of which would result in the paragraph being removed but would _also_ result in the spec being consistently updated so that it remained coherent. This change should be retroactive (i.e. should require previous decisions to be explained in terms of general principles). Without such guidance, I'm unable to effectively execute my duties as editor. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 9 June 2010 20:36:13 UTC