- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2010 03:46:08 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9874 Summary: HTML+RDFa 1.1 in @version could be confusing Product: HTML WG Version: unspecified Platform: Macintosh URL: http://dev.w3.org/html5/rdfa/#conformance OS/Version: MacOS X Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: HTML+RDFa (editor: Manu Sporny) AssignedTo: msporny@digitalbazaar.com ReportedBy: glsimpso@indiana.edu QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org CC: mike@w3.org, public-html@w3.org, msporny@digitalbazaar.com Since HTML5 does not have a version specification and RDFa does, <html version="HTML+RDFa 1.1" lang="en"> can be confusing with regard to understanding what is actually being versioned here. It seems to be that it's HTML (implied 5) plus RDFa 1.1 but without an explicitly stated HTML version number, it looks like the it is 1.1 of something called HTML+RDFa. My recommendation would be to add a version number to the HTML part of the string: <html version="HTML5+RDFa 1.1" lang="en"> -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 8 June 2010 03:46:09 UTC