- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2010 21:29:06 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8116 --- Comment #7 from Larry Masinter <lmm@acm.org> 2010-06-02 21:29:06 --- ISSUE-78 is (was) already marked as CLOSED. (ISSUE-78 did have an offer to write a change proposal, although not on a schedule to the satisfaction of the chairs.) ISSUE-78 is different, in that it explicitly calls for changing URL in the HTML document. The 'bug' here is that even if the terminology isn't changed, the terminology differences should be explained. In any case, TrackerRequest was not added according to the decision policy because: (a) I do have access to the tracker, and *could* open my own issue (b) TrackerRequest bugs should suggest a title. I'm not going to open an issue at this point, but wanted to note the anomaly that something could transition from TrackerRequest to TrackerIssue without the bug actually being mentioned in the body of the issue, as is required. (Presumably doing so would be 'new information' which would cause the issue to re-open.) -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 2 June 2010 21:29:08 UTC