- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 06:19:06 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10255 Summary: The earlier version where it said "If an address element applies to a section of a document, then it represents contact information for that section only" was a better approach. I see what you're after here, but it's way too 1996. "A web page" or "a docu Product: HTML WG Version: unspecified Platform: Other URL: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#the -address-element OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: HTML5 spec (editor: Ian Hickson) AssignedTo: ian@hixie.ch ReportedBy: contributor@whatwg.org QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org CC: mike@w3.org, public-html@w3.org Section: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#the-address-element Comment: The earlier version where it said "If an address element applies to a section of a document, then it represents contact information for that section only" was a better approach. I see what you're after here, but it's way too 1996. "A web page" or "a document" in 2010 terms is very, very often a composite content stream with numeous sources with independent attribution (contact info). This needs to work down to the div level. I would suggest that this be done with id attributes and some attribute of the address element that refers to an id attribute (e.g. <div id="foo">...<address scope="foo">...</address></div> Please re-examine this with a more "Web 2.0+" view. - Stanton - gmail: smccandlish - please subscribe me to this bug (I'm submitting this thru the floating mini-form at the bottom of http://whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work) Posted from: 68.35.93.63 -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 29 July 2010 06:19:07 UTC