W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > July 2010

[Bug 9843] Specced behavior for document.write("<link rel=stylesheet href=...><script>...</script>...") matches none of the top 4 engines

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 21:30:18 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1OZ9X0-0000hY-GU@jessica.w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9843


Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
                 CC|                            |ian@hixie.ch
         Resolution|                            |NEEDSINFO




--- Comment #1 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>  2010-07-14 21:30:17 ---
EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are
satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If
you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please
reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML
Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest
title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue
yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document:
   http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html

Status: Did Not Understand Request
Change Description: no spec change
Rationale:

Surely the script nesting level in this case (when you parse the
document.written "</script>") is non-zero, and so you don't go down the path
that blocks, you just go down the path that pauses the parser and resumes later
when you're not nested. Or am I misunderstanding?

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 14 July 2010 21:30:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 16:30:52 UTC