- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2010 21:29:57 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10083 --- Comment #15 from Shelley Powers <shelleyp@burningbird.net> 2010-07-08 21:29:57 --- Michael, may I suggest you not make a bad situation worse, by tossing in RDFa references willy nilly all throughout your document? These are just as inappropriate as the Microdata references. There's a term that should be branded across the forehead of every spec writer: Less, is more. Your document is an HTML Language Reference. At least, that's what your title says. Neither Microdata, nor RDFa, are part of the HTML language. That's why neither is part of the HTML5 spec. Your document is useful because it provides a simple to read and access overview of the HTML language -- the syntax, the requirements, the relationships between the elements. It does so cleanly, without all of the DOM and other material in the HTML5 spec. (The DOM interface pushes this, but at least it's presence is understandable). The more you add, the less useful the document will be. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 8 July 2010 21:29:59 UTC