- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2010 00:34:19 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10083 --- Comment #12 from Michael(tm) Smith <mike@w3.org> 2010-07-08 00:34:19 --- (In reply to comment #11) > The omission of "only" or any such other qualifying language in that Abstract > was not an accident or an oversight. It was intentional. I omitted it because > it was in fact intended for the scope to be restricted in the way you are > asserting that it is. Missed a "not" there. The last sentence should instead read, "I omitted it because it was in fact *not* intended for the scope to be restricted in the way you are asserting that it is." -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 8 July 2010 00:34:20 UTC