W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > July 2010

[Bug 10091] New: As far as I can tell, nothing specifies what the intrinsic width/height/ratio for iframes should be. You'd assume it's the height/width/ratio of the document, but of course that's wrong unless the iframe is seamless.

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Mon, 05 Jul 2010 21:00:51 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-ID: <bug-10091-2486@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10091

           Summary: As far as I can tell, nothing specifies what the
                    intrinsic width/height/ratio for iframes should be.
                    You'd assume it's the height/width/ratio of the
                    document, but of course that's wrong unless the iframe
                    is seamless.
           Product: HTML WG
           Version: unspecified
          Platform: Other
               URL: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#emb
                    edded-content-2
        OS/Version: other
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: HTML5 spec (editor: Ian Hickson)
        AssignedTo: ian@hixie.ch
        ReportedBy: contributor@whatwg.org
         QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
                CC: mike@w3.org, public-html@w3.org


Section: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#embedded-content-2

Comment:
As far as I can tell, nothing specifies what the intrinsic width/height/ratio
for iframes should be.    You'd assume it's the height/width/ratio of the
document, but of course that's wrong unless the iframe is seamless.

Posted from: 68.175.61.233

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 5 July 2010 21:00:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 16:30:51 UTC