- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 05 Jul 2010 12:59:40 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10068
Andreas Kuckartz <a.kuckartz@ping.de> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |a.kuckartz@ping.de
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Kuckartz <a.kuckartz@ping.de> 2010-07-05 12:59:40 ---
I agree with the sentiment but do not agree with the proposed solution.
In section 4.3.2 the spec already states that noscript is a "blunt instrument"
and that "it's generally better to avoid using noscript". An example explaining
how noscript can be avoided is also included.
That is far more important than declaring noscript "deprecated". Declaring a
widely used blunt instrument "deprecated" will not really help to change
practice. It also would not make sense without defining the meaning of
"deprecated" (the term currently is only used once in the spec for
presentational markup in HTML4).
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 5 July 2010 12:59:42 UTC