- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2010 20:39:29 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10069 Summary: Structured clone algorithm should throw something more informative than NOT_SUPPORTED_ERR Product: HTML WG Version: unspecified Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows XP Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: HTML5 spec (editor: Ian Hickson) AssignedTo: ian@hixie.ch ReportedBy: jonas@sicking.cc QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org CC: mike@w3.org, public-html@w3.org Currently the structured clone algorithm throws a NOT_SUPPORTED_ERR error when the cloning fails (for example due to the cloned object containing host objects). This is a fairly generic and uninformative error. One problem is that this makes it hard to defer to the HTML5 spec for other specs that are using structured clones. For example IndexedDB uses the structured clone algorithm for the IDBObjectStore.add method. However if all that is thrown if a "uncloneable" is passed to IDBObjectStore.add is NOT_SUPPORTED_ERR, then that gives the author very little information about what went wrong. I propose we instead throw a DATA_CLONE_ERR error, or some such. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 2 July 2010 20:39:30 UTC