W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > February 2010

[Bug 9041] Is it worth mentioning that while there's no DOM API for the "manifest" attribute itself, there is an API for the cache manifest?

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 10:39:48 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1NjsBA-0008Hn-MI@wiggum.w3.org> 
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9041





--- Comment #2 from contributor@whatwg.org  2010-02-23 10:39:48 ---
Checked in as WHATWG revision r4798.
Check-in comment: Mention window.applicationCache near the <html manifest>
definition.
http://html5.org/tools/web-apps-tracker?from=4797&to=4798


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 23 February 2010 10:39:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 23 February 2010 10:39:50 GMT