W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > February 2010

[Bug 9028] New: "(either because of a fatal error during load that's about to be reported, or because the load() method was invoked while the resource selection algorithm was already running, in which case it is fired synchronously during the load() method call)." - empt

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 16:02:46 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-ID: <bug-9028-2486@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9028

           Summary: "(either because of a fatal error during load that's
                    about to be reported, or because the load() method was
                    invoked while the resource selection algorithm was
                    already running, in which case it is fired synchronously
                    during the load() method call)." - empt
           Product: HTML WG
           Version: unspecified
          Platform: Other
               URL: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-
                    work/#mediaevents
        OS/Version: other
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: HTML5 spec bugs
        AssignedTo: dave.null@w3.org
        ReportedBy: contributor@whatwg.org
         QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
                CC: ian@hixie.ch, mike@w3.org, public-html@w3.org,
                    simonp@opera.com


Section: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#mediaevents

Comment:
"(either because of a fatal error during load that's about to be reported, or
because the load() method was invoked while the resource selection algorithm
was already running, in which case it is fired synchronously during the load()
method call)." - emptied isn't fired sync anymore

Posted from: 88.131.66.111 by simonp@opera.com


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 16 February 2010 16:02:47 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 16 February 2010 16:02:50 GMT