- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 17:34:57 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11554 --- Comment #7 from Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> 2010-12-16 17:34:56 UTC --- > I'm not sure how else "The :read-write pseudo-class must match the following > elements:" would be read Other places the spec uses similar wording for if/else cascades (which is how I believe Mounir read it) or conditions that need to be anded as opposed to or'ed. Seriously, just being explicit about which set operations should be applied to the sets defined by the conditions instead of writing something that implies something and then hoping that everyone, including non-native-English-speakers will properly understand your implications seems like a no-brainer to me.... -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 16 December 2010 17:35:00 UTC