- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 01:16:43 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10723 --- Comment #10 from Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com> 2010-12-16 01:16:41 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) > Please only file one issue per bug. What one issue is this bug raising? It seems that dealing with media fragment URIs has implications for several parts of the spec. The one issue is of course how to support media fragment URIs. But maybe we should now split it into several bugs now that the full set of consequences are being listed? My suggestion of first focus for this bug would be on what consequences the use of temporal media fragment URIs in a <video/audio @src> or <source @src> attribute has. Here are the consequences: 1. When a temporal media fragment URL is used in a video/audio element (e.g. http://ex.com/video.ogv#t=10,20), the media resource will start playing from fragment start time (10 in the example) and pause at end time (20 in the example) unless a @loop attribute is specified in which case the UA will repeat the fragment. If the user or JS interacts with the timeline of the media resource and jumps to a temporal location outside the fragment, the fragment context is broken and the full resource is regarded again, in particular a @loop will loop over the full resource again. 2. If the @controls attribute is given and a temporal media fragment URI is loaded, there is a need to introduce markers on the controls for the fragment, see e.g. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LfRRYp6mnu0 for an example implementation. Do you want me to open new bugs for the other issues? -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 16 December 2010 01:16:45 UTC