- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 02:01:52 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11259 --- Comment #3 from James Clark <jjc@jclark.com> 2010-12-10 02:01:52 UTC --- Hmm. That doesn't altogether make sense to me. If Polyglot Markup is a normative spec, then it is important that it carefully defines conformance. For this sort of spec, the possibilities are: 1. Conformance for documents 2. Conformance for software: (a) Software that produces documents (b) Software that consumes documents The fact that there are no consequences for user agents means that 2(b) is not really meaningful here. But I think 1 and 2(a) are. You can define 2(a) in terms of 1 (producing software is conforming if it produces conforming documents). I believe the right approach is to use MUST whenever it is a constraint that conforming documents must obey. Perhaps I should open a separate bug for this. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 10 December 2010 02:01:54 UTC