- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 16:58:48 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9887 --- Comment #23 from David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk> 2010-08-23 16:58:47 --- (In reply to comment #19) > Oh and we could make the value be application/xhtml+xml instead of > (or as well as) text/html, After some discussion by the Math Working Group of various alternatives, we would like to state a preference that annotation-xml be parsed as currently specified (defaulting to mathml namespace) unless the encoding attribute is either text/html or application/xhtml+xml in which case it should be parsed more like mtext with element content defaulting to html (and any nested html elements not causing the math expression to be terminated). We did consider the simpler alternative you suggested in comment #20 of just always parsing annotation-xml like mtext, however the real problem there is that when using the html parsing rules any xml /> empty element syntax would have parsed as a start tag rather than an empty tag, and this is much harder for any script to correct than "just" being in the wrong namespace. Having the default behaviour be to put an unusable annotation in the DOM seemed too dangerous. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 23 August 2010 16:58:50 UTC