[Bug 10068] Suggest making noscript obsolete but conforming

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10068





--- Comment #39 from Lee Kowalkowski <lee.kowalkowski@googlemail.com>  2010-08-22 20:08:55 ---
> You say firewall stripping of script is "BS"

Having a firewall or proxy vandalise your content is something for which one
just cannot prepare.  PE is no guarantee, because you don't know the criteria
such firewalls employ, if you have multiple scripts on a page (likely if using
API's directly from provider domains) you'll have no idea if all your scripts
are available on the client.  Although you could super-defensively code around
most of it, you'd eventually have to draw a line at catering for the
ridiculous. 

PE is also an unhelpful suggestion for those unprepared to provide a fall-back.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.

Received on Sunday, 22 August 2010 20:08:57 UTC