[Bug 10068] Suggest making noscript obsolete but conforming

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10068





--- Comment #38 from Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com>  2010-08-22 16:29:54 ---
Woah there cowboy.

To pick a random site, I went to Facebook and looked at how they're using
<noscript>.  They use it twice on the page I happened to look at:

<noscript><meta http-equiv=refresh content="0; URL=/home.php?_fb_noscript=1"
/></noscript>
<noscript><meta http-equiv="X-Frame-Options" content="deny"/></noscript>

Both of these uses are quite reasonable and, AFAIK, cannot be achieved any
other way.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.

Received on Sunday, 22 August 2010 16:29:56 UTC