- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 18:21:47 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10202 --- Comment #13 from Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> 2010-08-19 18:21:47 --- (In reply to comment #12) > Ah, I didn't realise that codecs="" had names whose meaning was scoped to the > given MIME type, that changes matters significantly. I'll have to look at the > spec more carefully to make sure I haven't made a mistake because of that > assumption. > > Presumably though, the original report -- that codecs="" is applied to > video/mp4 -- is not actually a problem then, since video/mp4 is one of the > types that has well-defined codecs="" values? Right? Does that mean that > video/mp4 should be updated to accept codecs="", or is Julian wrong and it > already does? David already clarified that it's fine for video/mp4. The issue remains for application/octet-stream, and yet unregistered types in the examples. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 19 August 2010 18:21:49 UTC