- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 09:38:38 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10202 --- Comment #7 from Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> 2010-08-18 09:38:37 --- (In reply to comment #6) > The authors of 4281 had no 'ownership' of application/octet-stream so use of > the codecs parameter on this might be helpful but cannot be normative. I am > not sure that it helps anyone to forbid clients from looking at the parameter, > however, but we certainly cannot require that they look at something that is > formally undefined. Indeed. Also, it would be good if it was clear that application/octet-stream never should be played. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 18 August 2010 09:38:40 UTC