- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 20:03:54 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9894 --- Comment #7 from Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> 2010-08-10 20:03:52 --- (In reply to comment #6) > I concur with the Chairs on this item: if an individual, especially an editor, > believes that a change proposal would create inconsistencies within a document > (or between documents), it should be clearly indicated as part of one of the > change proposal or the straw poll. The chairs cannot be expected to ensure > proper consistency across the existing 8 documents produced by the HTML Working > Group. Thanks, PLH! The remaining question I see: is there anything we need to make the ample opportunities that we provide to working group members (including, but not limited to the editor) to express objections (for any reason, not just consistency) or alternative proposals clearer? -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 10 August 2010 20:03:55 UTC