- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 16:44:15 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9505 Mounir Lamouri <mounir.lamouri@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|WONTFIX | --- Comment #3 from Mounir Lamouri <mounir.lamouri@gmail.com> 2010-04-14 16:48:11 --- I know a disabled element is not a candidate for constraint validation but I think it would be better to remember an immutable element can't suffer from being missing even if in the present situation, it can't be immutable _and_ candidate for constraint validation. In my opinion it is not safe to consider that it's not possible at the moment so it doesn't worth to add it. But that's probably a dev point of view and I'm not re-opening this bug because of that... Actually, I'm wondering how to manage this situation: when a radio button is required and another radio button is checked in the radio group but this radio button is disabled. According to the current specification, the radio buttion shouldn't suffer from value missing. Is that the behavior wanted ? -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 14 April 2010 16:48:15 UTC