W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > April 2010

[Bug 9337] Frameset/Frame Specification Amendment

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2010 06:19:06 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1NxaDi-0003cM-Th@wiggum.w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9337


Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |WONTFIX




--- Comment #5 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>  2010-04-02 06:19:06 ---
EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are
satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If
you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please
reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML
Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest
title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue
yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document:
   http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html

Status: Rejected
Change Description: no spec change
Rationale: From the HTML perspective, frames are obsolete (they were deprecated
over 11 years ago). I don't think it makes sense to spend any time trying to
tweak how they are rendered at this point, given that HTML isn't a layout
language anyway.

I recommend dealing with any missing presentation features in the CSS working
group.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 2 April 2010 06:19:08 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 2 April 2010 06:19:08 GMT