- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 21:38:01 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7542 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #10 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> 2009-09-22 21:38:01 --- > I listed out several people who I know of who gave user requirements and use > cases in your initial request. I pulled these names from the documentation you > provided. I stated that as far as I know, none of these people have responded > positively. I confirmed that several have responded negatively. > You stated others have provided use cases and requirements, and that Microdata > fit their needs. I asked, specifically who they are, and what are the use > cases, so that we, the global audience, can verify for ourselves how well > Microdata meets the requirements. I then said that I didn't feel comfortable giving their names. You then said that therefore "no one who gave requirements or use cases has responded positively to Microdata", directly contradicting my statement. > You respond with either I'm not listening, or I'm calling you a liar. When you directly contradict something I'm claiming about my own actions, then those are the only two possibilities I'm aware of. > If you're not willing to put the Microdata section to a true test Not only am I willing to put the Microdata section to a true test, I'm doing it this Thursday and Friday. Google is doing a multiple-person usability study to examine three proposed variants of Microdata to see if we can improve the feature even further. > When you're willing to put the section to a rigorous test against all stated > use cases (which should become test cases), then we can see about putting it > back in. I've already done this. I'm not especially interested in a back-and-forth where you say I'm incompetent, say that what I'm claiming is false, and fail to raise any substantive technical arguments whatsoever. I recommend that you raise this with the chairs. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 22 September 2009 21:38:16 UTC