- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 17:23:39 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7670 --- Comment #26 from Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> 2009-09-20 17:23:38 --- (In reply to comment #25) > Google and Yahoo! are cited by RDFa advocates as notable RDFa consumers. (I > gather Drupal is a producer rather than consumer.) Google has more general > search market share that Y!, but of course their relative order in market share > in "RDFa"-enabled search could be reversed. General purpose search engines are just one of many potential consumers. > > And just because they screwed up the spec needs to change? > > No, not just because of that. However, when Google "will deviate from the > standard" on the point of prefix-based indirection, maybe there's something > wrong with prefix-based indirection. That discussion is fresh, let's see where it goes. It appears to me that you're jumping to conclusions, just because the current information seems to support your world-view. Another way to jump to conclusions would be to throw out Microdata and include RDFa -- after all, the "market leader" supports the latter but not the former, right? -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 20 September 2009 17:23:47 UTC