- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 19:55:02 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7670 --- Comment #10 from Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> 2009-09-18 19:55:01 --- (In reply to comment #9) > The problems with prefixes that can be bound to arbitrary strings then combined > with other strings to form a third set of string are documented and > demonstrable. The examples you gave are either things that don't use such > prefixes (like URIs), or that do and have not had anywhere near the level of > deployed success that HTML has (like XML namespaces). > ... How is it relevant whether a specific technology has the same level of "deployed success"? And it it's relevant, why does HTML5 include tons of stuff that hasn't any "deployed success" at all? -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 18 September 2009 19:55:13 UTC