- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 13:43:07 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7059
Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Resolution|NEEDSINFO |
--- Comment #30 from Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@redhat.com> 2009-09-10 13:43:02 ---
(In reply to comment #28)
> We're not going to delay the spec until such time as the workings groups can
> meet — the HTML working group is literally hundreds of people, so all we'd
> ever be able to do is have a subset of the group meet, like we're doing at the
> TPAC. Plus, such a group from the HTMLWG would by charter be unable to make any
> decisions, anyway, since we have to make decisions in a way that allows
> asynchronous participation.
Asynchronous participation is fine with me - from my email, it looks like our
chair proposed to have some members of your WG join our WGs telcon on the 15th
(Maciej Stachowiak also pointed out that this needs to be resolved before
TPAC).
Currently, the chairs of our two working groups are communicating about this,
and it's pretty clear that our WG does not consider this resolved yet. I
suggest we leave it open until we reach agreement.
> If you don't want the spec to say what it says now, could you be more precise
> about what you would like it to say, and how that differs from what it says?
Commend #18 was my attempt to do this. It is not an official response from the
XML Query WG, merely wording that I thought solved the problem.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 10 September 2009 13:43:16 UTC