- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2009 01:47:12 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7508 --- Comment #2 from Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no> 2009-09-09 01:47:11 --- (In reply to comment #1) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Rather than marking up the periphery with e.g. an <annotation> element, authors should mark up the center, with <cite> - in analogy with how the draft proposes to use <dfn> in glossary lists: <dt><time>14:22</time> <cite>Leif</cite> (ironically)</dt><dd>I see.</dd> DISCUSSION: <dialog>, like <dl>, is a name/value list. Each <dt> represents an act in that dialog. The act is bound to a name (in the name/value sense of "name") which represents a participant/some participants (usually represented by name(s) of the participant[s]). The act of each participant took place at a particular place in time and space and was performed in a certain manner . By default the act of each participants is neutral word utterance. In those cases, the <dt> only needs to contain the name of the acting participant. If the act is not a neutral utterance - or if it doesn't involve word utterance at all, it must be noted inside <dt> beside the participant name. The value part in these name/value pairs, are the word utterances of the participants. (After all, the purpose of the <dialog> element is to identify speech/utterance.) Now, you propose to single out what, inside <dt>, that represent indication/annotation/notes. However, there is another method: For <dl>, if it is being used to create a list of defined words - a glossary - then the draft recommends to single out the defined word using the <dfn> element. From the draft per today <http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html#the-dl-element>: <dt><dfn>Flat</dfn>, n.</dt><dd>A deflated tire.</dd> The "n." in the above example becomes extra information - annotation/notes - that helps you to decide/see/understand which exact word that is being define. And analogously, for <dialog>, instead of marking up what is annotation (the periphery), one could mark up what the center is - the participant name(s) - to repate the example from the exectutive summary: <dt><time>14:22</time> <cite>Leif</cite> (ironically)</dt><dd>I see.</dd> Regarding <indication>/<annotation>/<note>, is such an element linked any more to <dialog> than to other elements? It could eventually be needed many places and could deserve its own bug report. But at the same time it strikes me that we have many "note elements" already. For example <aside> ... And may be <figure>. That none of them are allowed inside <dt> is another problem ... -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 9 September 2009 01:47:22 UTC