- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2009 21:00:00 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7540 Summary: Spec for metadata extensions does not define which states are allowed/conforming Product: HTML WG Version: unspecified Platform: PC OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: HTML5 spec bugs AssignedTo: dave.null@w3.org ReportedBy: mjs@apple.com QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org CC: ian@hixie.ch, mike@w3.org, public-html@w3.org The spec for meta extensions (currently section 4.2.5.2) defines three statuses for extensions (Proposal, Accepted, and Unendorsed) and says that conformance checkers must check the wiki to determine whether a meta name value is allowed. However, it does not say which of these three statuses count as allowed - is it only the Accepted status, Accepted and Proposal status, or all three statuses that count as allowed for validators (and therefore presumably conforming)? The wiki page does not make this clear either. The spec should be explicit about this. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 7 September 2009 21:00:10 UTC