- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2009 12:23:57 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7525 --- Comment #4 from Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> 2009-09-07 12:23:57 --- (In reply to comment #3) > ... > This has nothing to do with ideology (what ideology?). HTML5 was written from > scratch. > ... The belief that doing so is the right thing to do is IMHO ideological. > We could move the three definitions in the HTML5 spec to another spec, but they > are all significantly more useful than "keywords", so there are stronger > reasons to keep them in the spec. For instance, "generator" affects the > behaviour of validators, "application-name" has normative conformance criteria > for UAs, and "description" is actually used by all manner of UAs. > > Since the only reason you have provided for defining this feature is that some > other document once defined it, I haven't added it. Please reopen the bug if > there are more compelling reasons. > ... That is incorrect; another reason I have provided is that it is widely used; and there's no good reason to make these documents non-conforming. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 7 September 2009 12:24:05 UTC