- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 06 Sep 2009 22:47:19 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7509 Summary: Consider <dl type="dialog"> instead of <dialog> Product: HTML WG Version: unspecified Platform: All URL: http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html#the-dl- element OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: HTML5 spec bugs AssignedTo: dave.null@w3.org ReportedBy: xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org CC: ian@hixie.ch, mike@w3.org, public-html@w3.org Some argument for choosing <dl dialog> or <dl type="dialog"> instead of <dialog>: (1) Breakability: [Relates to In IE, Firefox, Opera and Webkit ] When used inside <dl> it is OK to not close <dt> and <dd>. But inside a new element, such as <dialog>, legacy (aka current) user agents will make the first element after </dialog> in the following example a child of the preceding <dd>: <dialog><dt>Name<dd>Word</dialog> <p>Paragraph. Same goes for the following example, except that it becomes a child of the unclosed <p> <dialog><dt>Name<dd>Word <p>Paragraph.</dialog> <span>span</span> (2) Bug 7508: There is no reason to have different rules for where <dt> is permitted when used inside <dialog> and when used inside <dl>. (3) HIstory: HTML 4 reccommeds dialogs inside <dl> (4) Future: As HTML developes, one might want to use <dl> for other types of lists as well - an attribute solution sets a precedence for such extensions. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 6 September 2009 22:47:29 UTC