W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > September 2009

[Bug 7475] Semantics of rel=first and rel=index breaks specs and implementations

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2009 23:30:53 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1MizHx-0006pr-C5@wiggum.w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7475





--- Comment #2 from Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>  2009-09-02 23:30:52 ---
Alexandre Alapetite informs about how "Link Widgets" implements "first",
"index" etc:

              http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Sep/0122.html

The "XHTML Vocabulary" 

http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml/vocab/

The XHTML vocabulary has "last" as the opposite of "start". This contradicts
how "last" is interpreted in Opera, Seamonkey and iCab, where "first" and
"last" are opposites without "start" and "first" being the same thing. However,
the XHTML Vocab is here seemingly in line with the HTML 5 draft with regard to
how it treats "first" and "start" as synonyms.

But XHTML Vocab and the current draft still disagrees about "index".


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 2 September 2009 23:31:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 2 September 2009 23:31:04 GMT