- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 14:52:29 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7978
--- Comment #11 from Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com> 2009-10-26 14:52:29 ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> So I'm trying to understand the change linked to in comment 6. What behavior
> does it give for the following document:
>
> <body>
> <table>
> <form><tr><td><input name="one"></td></tr></form>
> <form><tr><td><input name="two"></td></tr></form>
> </table>
> <input name="three">
> <form><input name="four"></form>
> <input name="five">
> </body>
>
> ? What does the DOM look like?
Like this XML:
<body>
<table>
<form/><tbody><tr><td><input name="one"/></td></tr>
<form/><tr><td><input name="two"/></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<input name="three"/>
<form><input name="four"/></form>
<input name="five"/>
</body>
> Which input is associated with which form?
Same as before. "three" and "five" aren't associated with any form; "one",
"two" and "four" are associated with the form you'd expect.
> How does that compare to what UAs do currently?
http://software.hixie.ch/utilities/js/live-dom-viewer/saved/292
In this case it seems to match old Gecko, WebKit and Opera (even though Opera
has a different strategy for dealing with forms in tables currently). The
association should match IE, too.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 26 October 2009 14:54:42 UTC