- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 12:34:29 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7806
Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Resolution|NEEDSINFO |
--- Comment #22 from Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> 2009-10-22 12:34:28 ---
(In reply to comment #21)
> How so?
By saying "should" instead of "must" you suggest that there may be cases where
it's acceptable not to follow the requirement.
Or, phrased differently: if it's "must" in RFC 4287, why is it "should" here?
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 22 October 2009 12:34:33 UTC