W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > October 2009

[Bug 7862] Support Extended Processing Behavior via @profile/@version

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 03:20:33 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1N0RkX-0007jN-SY@wiggum.w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7862





--- Comment #6 from Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>  2009-10-21 03:20:33 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> I think Manu has withdrawn the html@version proposal for now.

Yes, although it causes problems for the XHTML+RDFa REC - I'll discuss this
with the RDFa Task Force and see how they'd like to proceed.

> I think making head@profile more conforming is covered by ISSUE-55 (though I
> expect at least some would like it to be fully conforming, not just "conforming
> but obsolete" as Manu proposed): http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/55

I have heard that some want it to be fully conforming, but it didn't seem like
those were the majority. The discussion seemed that a majority of those that
didn't want @profile to be entirely obsolete were fine with it being obsolete
but conforming.

> For <link rel="profile"> we could use input on whether anyone wishes to pursue
> this further.

I would expect the RDFa Task Force would want to pursue this route if @version
and @profile in HEAD remained obsolete and non-conforming.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 21 October 2009 03:20:37 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 21 October 2009 03:20:42 GMT