http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8329 Michael(tm) Smith <mike@w3.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID --- Comment #2 from Michael(tm) Smith <mike@w3.org> 2009-11-18 11:42:41 --- OK, further data which instead suggests that there is a (small) case for including "code on object elements" as obsolete <Philip`> http://software.hixie.ch/utilities/js/live-dom-viewer/?%3C!DOCTYPE%20html%3E%0A%3Cbody%3E%0A%3Cobject%20id%3Do%3E%3C%2Fobject%3E%3Cscript%3Edocument.getElementById%28%27o%27%29.code%3D1%3C%2Fscript%3E - hmm, browsers support it <Philip`> http://google.com/codesearch?q=%3Cobject%5B%5E%3E%5D%2A%5Cscode%3D - some people use it so, I will move this to resolved/invalid -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.Received on Wednesday, 18 November 2009 11:42:43 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 18 November 2009 11:42:43 GMT