W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > June 2009

[Bug 6784] [blocked on webidl] WebStorage should include Window IDL for Storage APIs

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2009 20:12:53 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1MBDsL-0001l3-U9@wiggum.w3.org>

Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
            Summary|WebStorage should include   |[blocked on webidl]
                   |Window IDL for Storage APIs |WebStorage should include
                   |                            |Window IDL for Storage APIs

--- Comment #1 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>  2009-06-01 20:12:53 ---
I'm waiting for WebIDL to have a way to say "this interface bit is just an
extension of that interface bit" without having to have casting or a new
interface name or anything. Something like:

   interface A {
      void foo();

   [Supplemental] interface A {
      void bar();

...which would be exactly equivalent to:

   interface A {
      void foo();
      void bar();

(The idea being to not let details of the specification organisation impact the
implementation requirements.)

Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 1 June 2009 20:13:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 16:30:37 UTC