- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2009 14:55:58 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8552 --- Comment #9 from Shelley Powers <shelleyp@burningbird.net> 2009-12-27 14:55:57 --- > > We disagree. Luckily there's a procedure in place to handle disagreement. > > Fair enough. It just seemed like your original suggestion was based on some > incorrect assumptions about the spec. I just wanted to set the record straight > on those, to make sure we have the correct information on the record. If none > of this changes your mind, so be it. > We have to disagree that my suggestion is based on incorrect assumptions. In a way, that's what disagreement is: the belief that the person you disagree with is basing their opinion on incorrect assumptions. As for "record" that would be something that comes from the change proposal, if the bug is marked as WONTFIX. But people have reacted with irritation at multiple comments going back and forth in the bugs (and in the email lists, at least when I and some others in the HTML WG participate, or comment). I wouldn't want to cause anyone irritation. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 27 December 2009 14:55:59 UTC