[Bug 8114] Section "months" should be renamed to "year-months". This is clearer, and allows the spec to add a section just handling months (without years) in the future.

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8114


Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |WONTFIX




--- Comment #2 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>  2009-12-08 16:49:05 ---
EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are
satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If
you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please
reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML
Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest
title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue
yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document:
   http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html

Status: Rejected
Change Description: no spec change
Rationale: I think "year-months" and "year-weeks" would be confusing. I agree
that we would need to change it in the future if we introduced a yearless-month
widget (though why <select> wouldn't be enough I don't know), but changing it
now would be premature, IMHO.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.

Received on Tuesday, 8 December 2009 16:49:07 UTC