- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 08 Aug 2009 01:05:01 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7232
Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
--- Comment #1 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> 2009-08-08 01:05:00 ---
No, <iframe> isn't CDATA for syntax purposes, only for parsing. From a syntax
point of view, it's more like <noscript>:
"When used in HTML documents, the allowed content model of iframe elements is
text, except that invoking the HTML fragment parsing algorithm with the iframe
element as the context element and the text contents as the input must result
in a list of nodes that are all phrasing content, with no parse errors having
occurred, with no script elements being anywhere in the list or as descendants
of elements in the list, and with all the elements in the list (including their
descendants) being themselves conforming."
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Saturday, 8 August 2009 01:05:12 UTC