W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > June 2008

[Bug 5744] Improved Fragment Identifiers

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 21:08:29 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1KAAJx-0007kh-Gu@wiggum.w3.org>

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5744





--- Comment #38 from Michael(tm) Smith <mike@w3.org>  2008-06-21 21:08:29 ---
(In reply to comment #36)
> (In reply to comment #33)
> > ...
> > there is no other spec for fragment identifiers. there is the old html4 spec,
> Actually, there are, both in IETF land (for text/html and
> application/xhtml+xml), and in W3C land:
> 
> - RFC 2854 currently defines fragment identifiers for text/html, based on the
> HTML 4.01 spec 
> 
> - RFC 3236 currently defines fragment identifiers for application/xhtml+xml,
> based on RFC 3023 (XML media types)
> 
> - There's also NOTE-xhtml-media-types-20020801 which probably should be updated
> when HTML5 is ready
> 
> (<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5744#c22>)
> 
> The question is whether it's in scope for us to update these specs (and yes, I
> think it is). 

OK, then that's something actionable. Julian, can you please raise in issue in
the group Tracker for this?


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Saturday, 21 June 2008 21:09:06 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 21 June 2008 21:09:07 GMT