- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 06:15:40 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5744 --- Comment #35 from Erik Wilde <dret@berkeley.edu> 2008-06-21 06:15:40 --- (In reply to comment #34) > (In reply to comment #32) > > To be clear and more precise, what I meant here is that I don't see that there > > would be any value in the HTML5 draft saying anything more about existing *RFC > > 3987* fragment IDs than what is said bout them in RFC 3987 itself. > > i am confused now. rfc 3987 just defines a syntax for uri/iri, nothing else. > fragment identifier semantics are defined per media type. i was not as clear here as i should have been: rfs 3987 just says there is a random string after the '#'. a media type then defines additional syntax constraints (an xml name for html4, the more complicated keyword/parenthesis-based syntax of xpointer, something like page=42 for PDF) and defines semantics. for rfc 3987, the fragment identifier is totally opaque, it is not a name or an @id or anything, it is just a string. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Saturday, 21 June 2008 06:16:14 UTC