- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 08:57:44 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5773 --- Comment #12 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> 2008-06-20 08:57:44 --- > > The HTTPWG's, I guess. Who works on the relevant RFC? > > Well, the RFCs already specify the solution. HTTPbis can potentially *clarify* > it, but that's it. Sure, but what WG is responsible for maintaining these RFCs, dealing with implementation feedback, etc? > The really simple question is: what is needed to make Apple and Microsoft > implement what's already specified? Time, probably. Possibly you could accelerate it by giving them a good business reason to prioritise it (e.g. have some major site use it and break without it, or pay them large amounts of money). > If the HTML WG (or the W3C in general) could help, that would be great. I don't see any way we can influence the priority that a browser vendors gives a feature. On the contrary, with HTML5 it is the browser vendors who tell _me_ what the next priority item is, not vice versa. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 20 June 2008 08:58:18 UTC