W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > June 2008

[Bug 5752] Parsing should be specified for future updates

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 11:26:33 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1K7Ttx-00084e-LS@wiggum.w3.org>


Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
                 CC|                            |simonp@opera.com

--- Comment #3 from Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>  2008-06-14 11:26:32 ---
What would you rather happened with unknown tags in head? Treat them as void
elements? What would you like to happen with unknown tags between </head> and
<body>? Why is it a problem to imply <body> for unknown tags?

If we are to add new elements in head they will have to either be empty or be
(R)CDATA elements that can take the <!--...--> hack as in <script> and <style>
for backwards compatibility anyway, and at that point it doesn't matter if it
implied <body> in legacy UAs -- it'll render the same.

New elements in body OTOH will require you to have an explicit <body> tag if
unknown elements are put in head, otherwise you can't style the new element in
legacy UAs.


<!doctype html>

Should that result in:

...#text: hello
..#text: world


...#text: hello
...#text: world

Per spec currently it's the latter, and personally I think it has a better
forward compat story than the former.

Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Saturday, 14 June 2008 11:27:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 16:30:33 UTC