- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 08:49:48 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6300 Summary: reference RFC 5322 instead of RFC 2822 Product: HTML WG Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Spec bugs AssignedTo: dave.null@w3.org ReportedBy: mike@w3.org QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org CC: ian@hixie.ch, mike@w3.org, public-html@w3.org The HTML5 draft currently references RFC 2822 in order to define what a "valid e-mail address" is. "A valid e-mail address is a string that matches the production dot-atom "@" dot-atom where dot-atom is defined in RFC 2822 section 3.2.4, excluding the CFWS production everywhere. [RFC2822]". A newer RFC, RFC 5322, is intended to obsolete RFC 2822. The "dot-atom" production seems to be define identically in RFC 5322 and RFC 2822: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2822#section-3.2.4 http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5322#section-3.2.3 Also, just for the record, some notes about why the HTML5 draft doesn't just reference the "addr-spec" production instead of dot-atom "@" dot-atom: <Hixie> addr-spec doesn't match user expectations <Hixie> e.g. iirc something like this matches addr-spec: "foo" (bar) @ foo.com <Hixie> meaning foo@foo.com <Hixie> and then you can start introducing escapes and all kinds of stuff -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 11 December 2008 08:56:31 UTC